Research

Tumor rejection by immunomodulation — from proof of principle to clinical development

SITOIGANAP (ERC-1671)

Dr. Stathopoulos's research focuses on training the immune system to recognize and reject brain tumors. That work led to SITOIGANAP (ERC-1671), a cell-based immunotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma that combines tumor cells and tumor-cell lysates, developed by ERC Belgium SA / ERC Netherlands BV.

The program has been developed through collaborations with leading institutions, including the University of Southern California, the University of California Irvine, and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute / Harvard Medical School.

For information about SITOIGANAP and ERC, please visit ERC (Epitopoietic Research Corporation).

Milestones

Proof of principle
Laboratory work at the University of Southern California showed that vaccination with allogeneic and syngeneic tumor antigens led rats to reject malignant gliomas (Vaccine, 2008). The original article is below.
2005–2008
ERC founded
Dr. Stathopoulos founded ERC Belgium SA / ERC Netherlands BV to develop the vaccine, with GMP production supported by authorization from Dutch authorities.
2008
First patients
First report of ERC-1671 vaccine use in recurrent glioblastoma patients, Society for Neuro-Oncology, Washington.
2012
First clinical results
First clinical results of a personalized immunotherapeutic vaccine against recurrent glioblastoma (Vaccine, 2015).
2015
Phase II study
Phase II study of ERC1671 plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab plus placebo in recurrent glioblastoma (CNS Oncology, 2018).
2018
Early access
SITOIGANAP has been available under Right-to-Try and early-access pathways in the USA, Israel, Germany and Australia; full commercialization applications are in progress for additional countries.
Since 2018
Placebo-controlled Phase II
Double-blinded, placebo-controlled Phase II study of ERC1671 in recurrent glioblastoma (Neuro-Oncology, 2020).
2020
FDA Fast Track
The FDA granted Fast Track Designation to SITOIGANAP for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (July 2022). A prospective cohort study combined SITOIGANAP with immunomodulatory agents and checkpoint inhibitors (Frontiers in Oncology, 2022).
2022
Latest publication
Combined tumor cell and lysate-based vaccines for immunotherapy of primary and recurrent glioblastoma (Cancers, November 2025, read online).
2025
Phase III
A Phase III registration clinical trial application for SITOIGANAP is under preparation.
Next

Research focus

  • Central nervous system oncology and immunotherapy applications.
  • Glioblastoma treatment and tumor immune rejection by immunomodulation.
  • Therapeutic cancer vaccines and cell-based immunotherapy.
  • Gene therapy and adeno-associated viral vector research.
  • Immunology, infectious disease vaccination, and regenerative medicine.

The full list of selected publications is on the About page.

The original research: Tumor Rejection by Immunomodulation

This article describes the laboratory work, in rats, that led to the vaccine program. It was written in the mid-2000s and is kept here as it was published.

It is estimated that over 18,000 primary brain tumors occur in the United States each year. Of the those 18,000, over 60% are gliomas. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and most malignant of all gliomas with 75% of patients dying within 18 months of diagnosis and cannot be cured by surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or any other available treatment modality. Using basic principles of immunology, our research focuses on the immunological escape of brain tumors as they progress towards GBM. We recently have had astounding success in stimulating the immune system of rats to recognize and reject various tumors. The immunologic properties are an important area of investigation because immune–gene therapy by many approaches have shown promising results in animals models and constitute theoretically attractive new approach for any treatment against malignancy.

The Major Histocompatibility Complex

The Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) is a genetic region (piece of DNA) that codes for proteins, MHC class I and class II, that play an essential role in regulating and modulating immune response. MHC class I are surface glycoproteins located on most cells that bind to proteins derived from tumors and viruses and, as a unit, interact with natural killer cells (NK) and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL). These cells then induce the death of these tumor and virus infected cells.

These viral and tumor proteins are derived from degraded intracellular proteins from virus and tumor infected cells by a process known as antigen processing. Antigen processing is a complex mechanism that involves numerous steps from degrading the protein into tiny pieces, to transporting it to the surface of the cell. A defect in any of these steps may lead to non-expression of the MHC class I : antigen complex, and escape from recognition by the immune system, resulting in unchecked growth.

The MHC class I molecule is not only highly specific in differentiating self from non-self, but is also much conserved since they are inherited with very little if any genetic recombination. This quality has been exploited in transplantation medicine. Identical twins and genetically close family members are less likely to reject transplanted tissue since they have similar MHC I genes. Therefore, homozygous (genetically identical) individuals such as identical twins and syngeneic rats could theoretically accept a brain tumor from his/her homozygous donor (twin). Yet more critically, they would reject a brain tumor from a heterozygous (non-identical) donor based on a specific and targeted immune response.

For example, MHC I is reported to be involved in immune surveillance and elimination of cells with mitochondrial mutations. In human glioma cells multiple mutations in mitochondria have been found. From this it is possible to theorize that all gliomas of a certain type/grade will have similar mitochondrial mutations not found in normal human brain cells. Therefore we hypothesized that GBM transplantation between two non-genetically identical individuals will not only induce rejection of the transplanted tissue, but also train the immune system to recognize proteins specific to GBMs and hopefully lead to rejection of the tumor.

Initial experiments

Our initial experiments used two different strains of rat, the Sprague Dawley and Fisher and various cell lines that are capable of producing tumors, syngeneic, in these rats. Therefore syngeneic cell lines injected into rats will continue to grow into a progressively larger tumor (see data); and allogeneic (not capable of producing tumors) cell lines will either not grow at all (as in the Sprague Dawley), or grow minimal tumors that are later rejected without intervention (as in the Fisher).

We induced tumors in each of 9 Sprague Dawley by injecting syngeneic (compatible) tumor cell lines into their left hind flank and observed substantial tumor growth. Three of these rats were used as control, not treated, and were subsequently sacrificed. Five rats were injected with cell lysates (components from bust cells) from the original tumor and other allogenic cell lines at regular intervals. These tumors became progressively smaller and the rats were eventually able to completely reject the tumor (see graph). The remaining rat started began as a control rat, and then began receiving lysate injections when the other control rats were sacrificed. Like the rats in the treatment group, this rat also rejected the tumor. This experiment is currently being repeated with the fisher rats, and we are observing similar results.

Immune memory

Most recently we began to examine immune memory in cancer rejection. It is already documented that once the body mounts an immune response, it carries with it a “memory” of that event so that it may react more quickly if greeted with a similar insult. Knowing this, we wondered what would happen if we re-injected our “cured” Sprague Dawley rats with the same cell line that produced the original tumor. Each of the three rats we used has remained tumor free for twenty days. Before treatment, we were able to induce tumors in these rats using 1/5 the number of cells (100,000 vs 500,000) which produced substantial tumors within ten days.

Implications

The implications of this experiment are far reaching. The induction of the immune system to treat cancer runs contrary to some currently accepted therapies such as chemotherapy, which kills not only rapidly dividing cells such as cancer cells but also hair cells, gastrointestinal lining cells and cells of the blood/immune system. This leads to the much undesired side effects of chemotherapy: baldness, diarrhea, infection and anemia. Our research suggests that regular injections with allogenic and syngeneic strains of tumor induce a cell-killing response that is specific for the tumor. Also, these injections provide immunization from further exposure to the same tumor. In the future this may not only be used as part of the regimen to treat cancers in general, but possibly also as vaccination for them.